fbpx

How do you paint human suffering?

Extreme fire behavior in North Kennebunkport Maine during October 1947, courtesy Maine.gov.

The Great Fire of 1947

For my friend Barb, Maine’s Great Fires of 1947 are not distant history, but part of her family’s story. She’s from Kennebunk and grew up hearing about them from family members who were there.

The wildfires killed 16 people and burned over 200,000 acres statewide. They were centered in two distant places: Mount Desert Island and southern Maine.

1947 started with a sloppy, wet spring, but the rain stopped in July. By early autumn, Maine was perilously dry. State and local officials encouraged citizens to prepare. Fire towers that normally closed in September were reopened.

On October 7, fires started independently in Portland, Bowdoin and Wells. York County was hardest hit. Shapleigh and Waterboro were burned out. The cities of Biddeford and Saco and towns of Alfred, Lyman, Newfield, Kennebunk, Kennebunkport, Arundel, Dayton and Wells sustained significant fire damage, although their downtowns were saved.

Last fall, I was deeply troubled by the dryness of the woods in New York and New England. I told myself, “We never have forest fires here.” How wrong I was.

Aftermath of the Great Galveston Hurricane, courtesy Galveston Historical Society

The Great Galveston Hurricane

The 1900 Galveston Hurricane struck the Texas Gulf Coast on September 8, 1900. It destroyed the city of Galveston and claimed between 6,000-12,000 lives.

Back then, tropical storms were tracked and reported by ocean-going vessels. Spotters used weather glasses and natural phenomena like cloud formations to predict the weather. In Cuba, a Jesuit priest named Father Lorenzo Gangoite, reading those signs, figured the hurricane was heading to Texas. Our own nascent Weather Bureau ignored them.

The Saffir–Simpson hurricane wind scale wasn’t invented until the 1970s, but scientists think the hurricane made landfall as a Category 4 hurricane with winds of 135 mph and a storm surge of 15 feet. It washed over the low-lying barrier island.

Galveston rebuilt but never regained its economic dominance That shifted inland to Houston.

“A view across the devastated neighbourhood of Richmond in Halifax, Nova Scotia after the Halifax Explosion,” William James, courtesy Canadian Armed Forces

The Great Halifax Explosion

On December 6, 1917, two ships collided in busy Halifax (Nova Scotia) Harbour. The SS Mont-Blanc was a French cargo ship loaded with explosives including TNT, picric acid, and benzol. SS Imo was a Norwegian ship heading to Belgium with relief supplies.

At 9:04 AM, fire broke out on the Mont-Blanc, igniting its cargo. The explosion was about equal to 2.9 kilotons of TNT. It created a pressure wave that leveled much of the surrounding area, shattering windows as far as 80 km (50 miles) away, and lighting fires across the city. A massive fireball rose nearly 2 kilometers (1.2 miles) into the sky. The explosion was so powerful that it created a tsunami.

Over 1,900 people were killed instantly or in the immediate aftermath. About 9,000 more were injured from flying debris, burns, and the collapse of buildings. Thousands were left homeless. Buildings within a 1.6 km (1 mile) radius were obliterated.

Relief poured in from around the world. Boston sent medical personnel, supplies, and emergency equipment to Halifax within hours of the explosion. (To honor this, Nova Scotia sends a Christmas tree to Boston every year.)

The Third of May, 1814, Francisco Goya, courtesy Museo del Prado

Can an outsider paint human suffering?

The greatest artwork on the subject of human suffering is Francisco Goya’s The Disasters of War, and the paintings that relate to it, starting with The Third of May, 1808. The Peninsular War shattered Goya’s mental and physical health.

Guernica, in comparison, is at an emotional remove. Pablo Picasso painted it while in Paris. No matter how deeply he felt the tragedy, it wasn’t his own human suffering. I think that’s an unbridgeable chasm. And while I wish I could paint what I feel about the current wildfire crisis, I’m still profoundly glad I’m not there.

Reserve your spot now for a workshop in 2025:

Monday Morning Art School: gallery and studio light

American Eagle in Drydock, 12X16, $1159 unframed includes shipping and handling in continental US.

“Can you give me information on lighting for artists, especially lights that work well for watercolor painting?” asked my friend and sometimes-student. “I have a new table setup in a permanent spot now, but it doesn’t have much direct or indirect light from the windows in that room (they are under our deck on the east side of the house) and I am looking to purchase a light that will give me good natural lighting to paint by.”

It’s a pity she doesn’t have natural daylight, since it is the standard by which all studio light is measured. But we all sometimes need to work in less-than-optimal conditions.

Main Street, Owl’s Head, oil on archival canvasboard, $1623 includes shipping and handling in continental US.

The evolution of gallery and studio light

I’ll spare you the candle and gaslight, which were mostly obsolete by my childhood. Besides them, I’ve had incandescent, compact and regular fluorescent and LEDs (Light Emitting Diode) in my studio and gallery spaces.

Fluorescent lights are now illegal in my state and many others. Incandescent and halogen lamps are being phased out, but are excellent light sources for color quality.

In recent years, we’ve adopted LED technology. It’s more energy-efficient, longer-lasting, and offers greater design flexibility. LEDs offer color temperature shifting and dimming potential.

LED lights are now the most common choice for most lighting applications, but that doesn’t mean they are the best for color rendering.

Switching to LEDs can lead to a reduction in color accuracy, which we express as Color Rendering Index (CRI). The higher the CRI values, the closer a light source will be to natural daylight.

Evening in the Garden, 9X12, oil on archival canvasboard, $869 framed includes shipping and handling in continental US.

Color Rendering Index and more

“Daylight” balanced bulbs are a start, but they’re not the whole story. What’s most important is the CRI, which is 100 for daylight and usually 80 for LED, which is too low for accurate color. A few years ago, the best you could get in an LED was a CRI of 85. Today you can get CRI-90 and even 95 bulbs.

The CRI number indicates how accurately a given light source renders colors in the space it illuminates. Natural white light from the sun is a combination of all colors in the visible light spectrum. It renders the colors of objects accurately. Incandescent and halogen bulbs also have a CRI of 100, because they’re also broadband.

CRI is calculated by measuring individual colors and then averaging them. However, it doesn’t include some outliers, including R9 (red) and R13 (skin tone) colors. If you’re primarily a figure painter, you might choose light sources with high R9 and R13 values, in addition to a high CRI. How do you find that information? In the tedious small print on the manufacturer’s website.

Cinnamon Fern, 9X12, oil on archival canvasboard, $869 framed includes shipping and handling in continental US.

How do LEDs work?

LEDs make white light by combining red, green, and blue LEDs in the same light source or by incorporating white phosphors on a blue LED to generate white light. That isn’t a full spectrum, which means that some colors are missing in the light reflected to you.

LED technology is advancing every day, and getting closer to representing the full color spectrum in white LEDs. The LED bulbs in my gallery are CRI-90 and tunable, with five different color settings.

My gallery has conventional track lighting, but the fixtures aren’t the important issue. Just make sure you have enough fixtures so the light is more ambient than focused.

Reflected light

The cleanest color light can’t override brilliantly-colored walls. My studio has natural wood shiplap, it makes everything too warm. Doug doesn’t want me to repaint my studio walls white (I don’t blame him; they’re natural wood). In the daytime it’s not a problem; at night, white reflectors help.

Reserve your spot now for a workshop in 2025:

Our artistic legacy

The Wave, 9X12, oil on archival canvasboard, $869, includes shipping in continental US.

When the wind pummels my studio incessantly (as it’s done for the last week) Willa Cather’s lines come to mind: “…the wind sprang up afresh, with a kind of bitter song, as if it said: ‘This is reality, whether you like it or not. All those frivolities of summer, the light and shadow, the living mask of green that trembled over everything, they were lies, and this is what was underneath…’” Cheerful woman, that.

Unlike Cather, I’m not obsessed with death; still, it’s sometimes worth thinking about. “When a person dies, a whole world is destroyed,” is something my Jewish friends say. It’s a variation on a Talmudic teaching: “Whoever destroys a single soul, destroys an entire world; whoever saves a single soul, saves an entire world.”

Full moon on Penobscot Bay, 8X10, oil on archival canvasboard. I painted this as an experiment in strict symmetry, and to remind myself of a wonderful evening.

I was thinking about this as I reluctantly closed the last novel in a series by the late Canadian-American writer Charlotte MacLeod. Miss MacLeod suffered from Alzheimer’s disease, that terrible thief of minds. When she put down her pen in 1998 or thereabouts, several whole crazy worlds stopped.

Dorothy L. Sayers was more serious than MacLeod. She died while translating Dante’s Divine Comedy into English, but most of us know her creation Lord Peter Wimsey. That doesn’t make her scholarship unimportant; the hell that most of us visualize is for the most part Dante’s artistic legacy.

Nocturne on Clam Cove, 9X12, oil on archival canvasboard, $869.00 framed includes shipping in continental US.

What will be my artistic legacy?

When I die, my paintings will be part of my estate, inherited either by my husband or children. They might keep them, sell them, donate them, or burn them in the backyard. I’ve painted and sold enough work that it’s out there in the world regardless of what they do. I can’t predict whether the remainder will increase in value or make good firewood.

The biggest factor in the future value of your art is what you yourself have done to market it, but that’s by no means the only story. Vincent van Gogh might have lapsed into obscurity after his death had it not been for his brother’s widow, who recognized a marketable asset when she saw one. She needed to sell his paintings and, in the process, created his artistic legacy.

The primary value of your art after you die isn’t monetary (what the heck, you won’t be able to spend it) but in its future influence. Dead painters bring me joy every single day. If we can pay that forward, painting will be well worth the time and care we’ve lavished on it.

Wildfire remnant along the Transcanada Highway, painted en plein air in 2016. Wildfire is an annual occurrence in Alaska and subarctic western Canada; we don’t notice because they are empty spaces.

Nothing lasts forever

This week the Getty Villa was threatened by the Palisades fire. That’s the part of the Getty that contains Greek and Roman art, already in limited supply in this world. The collection survived in part because of its state-of-the-art design but also because its staff has been ruthless in clearing brush.

That area is home to many cultural landmarks as well as some of America’s most luxurious homes. It’s likely that a lot of art has gone up in smoke this week. While that’s small potatoes compared to the human cost, it’s a good reminder that nothing—including great art—lasts forever. The bottom line for each of us is our non-tangible legacy: our character, generosity, wisdom and kindness.

Reserve your spot now for a workshop in 2025:

Drawing on the right side of the brain

Beach Roses, 9X12, oil on linen. I’m only posting warm-weather pictures today in protest against this week’s howling Arctic winds.

I haven’t seen my copy of Betty Edwards’ Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain since the 1980s, so I can’t remember much about the drawing exercises. According to the internet, they were based on contour drawing, negative space, size relationships, shading, drawing from memory and drawing from imagination. These are all important concepts, and any drawing exercises will make you better at drawing. On the other hand, there was the whole gestalt thing, which was a trippy 1970s way of saying that drawing is greater than the sum of its parts.

Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain is critically flawed in that it rests on the premise of a left-brain, right-brain dichotomy. That’s a theory that’s been scientifically debunked but never seems to die.

Spring Greens, 8X10, oil on archival canvasboard, $652 framed includes shipping and handling in continental US.

What was the ‘drawing on the right side of the brain’ theory, anyway?

When the first edition of Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain was published in 1979, brain science was comparatively primitive. Research into callosotomies (so-called split-brain syndrome) led to a limited and distorted understanding of brain lateralization.  

The theory that people are either left-brained (logical, analytical, and detail-oriented) or right-brained (creative, intuitive, and emotional) gained immediate traction. Lefties, of course, were supposed to be right-brain-dominant, and therefore artsy. You poor right-handers (about 90% of the population) were doomed to be engineers and accountants. You could loosen up the synapses by doing right-brain exercises, including that insidious art-school exercise, making righthanded people draw with their left hands. Lefties are more likely to be ambidextrous, so asking that of righthanded people was particularly unfair.

As an ambidextrous lefty myself, I was adept at mirror writing but mostly because I was bored out of my nut in school. Even today, nobody really knows what causes left-handedness. There’s no evidence that we’re any more creative than right-handed people, but a lot of us lefties were told we were ‘arty’ .

Apple Blossom Time, oil on archival canvasboard, $869 framed includes shipping and handling in continental US.

Subsequent studies have failed to show any evidence that people are predominantly left-brained or right-brained, regardless of which hand they use. Moreover, brain activity does not align with personality traits. A 2013 study using fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) of over 1,000 participants found no evidence of individuals showing a dominant use of one hemisphere over the other.

You need your whole dang brain

Certain functions like language processing and spatial awareness may be lateralized, but most brain activities involve collaboration between both hemispheres. That’s especially true of complex tasks and traits like creativity, intuition, or linear thinking. They happen all over your brain.

Furthermore, a tremendous body of research on neuroplasticity shows that the human brain is far from fixed. It can repair and change itself, sometimes in profound ways.

Spring Allee, oil on archival canvasboard, 14X18, $1594.00 framed includes shipping and handling in continental US.

Why do I care?

Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain remains a best-selling drawing and pop psychology text, and the left brain-right brain theory has been accepted into our common folklore.

The fantasy that there’s a disconnect between logic and emotion, science and art, structure and creativity, goes back at least as far as Star Trek. It’s the biggest reason why people think they can’t draw.

I’ve got a friend who says she can’t do math but is a fine seamstress. What are alterations and patternmaking but geometry? Math, language and art are all whole-brain activities, and they mesh together. It’s a lie that you can’t do one of them because of how your brain is wired.

Reserve your spot now for a workshop in 2025:

Monday Morning Art School: Edgar Payne’s compositional armatures

Dawn along Upper Red Rock Loop Road, Sedona, 20X24 oil on canvas, $2318 unframed includes shipping and handling in continental US.

Tomorrow I start teaching a class on composition and brushwork. In preparation I’m building an exercise based on Edgar Payne‘s Composition of Outdoor Painting. Thinking about each example has brought me back to the works of two brilliant designers, Édouard Manet and Wayne Thiebaud.

I don’t like using the same artist for each example. Instead, I try to mix it up, to demonstrate to my students that fundamental compositions have been used throughout history. Thiebaud was a celebrated modernist, but you can find Payne’s armatures in every one of Thiebaud’s paintings. Despite his pop art color and subjects, he rested everything on classical design.

No Northern Lights Tonight, 6X8, oil on archival canvasboard, $348 includes shipping and handling in continental US.

Edgar Payne wrote his book more than eighty years ago, and it’s still the best composition book I’ve read.  You can see the images here, or you can learn to apply them in one of my painting classes or workshops.

Rookie error

Beginning painters think those armatures are about placing objects. Instead, they are always about value (light or dark), although that value sometimes takes the form of an object. There are times when objects and shadows mingle; for example, a large piñon and some small creosote bushes can combine with their shadows to form a dark triangular mass. But it’s always the weight of the darks and lights that holds a painting together, not the nominal subject matter.

Surf’s Up is 12X16, on a prepared birch surface. $1159 includes shipping and handling in the Continental US.

Paintings compel not because of detail but with value. It’s not enough, for example, that an object runs at a diagonal; you must make a persuasive shift along that diagonal. This is the primary lesson of Winslow Homer’s incredible seascapes.

Composition rests on the following principles:

  • The human eye responds first to shifts in value, and following that, in shifts in chroma and hue;
  • We follow hard edges and lines;
  • We filter out passages of soft edges and low contrast, and indeed we need them as interludes of rest;
  • We like divisions of space that aren’t easily solved or regular.
High Surf, 12X16, oil on prepared birch painting surface, $1159 includes shipping and handling in continental US.

Let’s talk about our feelings

Just as Payne distilled the basic structures of paintings into simple shapes, he also recognized that artists can use certain structures to provoke feelings. For example, clashing shapes provoke anxiety, while unbroken horizontal lines are fundamentally calm.

Music, sculpture, poetry, painting, and every other fine art form relies on internal, formal structure to be intelligible. This is easiest to see in music, where the beginner starts by learning chords and patterns. These patterns are (in western music, anyway) universal, and they’re learned long before the student starts writing complex musical compositions.

Music is an abstract art because it’s all about tonal relationships, with very little realism needed to make us understand the theme. A composer doesn’t need little bird sounds to tell us he’s writing about spring. Likewise, the painter doesn’t need to festoon little birdies on his canvas to tell us he’s painting about spring. That should already be apparent in the light, structure and tone of his work.

The strength of the painting is laid down before the artist first applies paint, in the form of a structural idea-a sketch or series of sketches that work out a plan for the painting.

All good painting rests on good abstract design. Still, most realist painters don’t spend nearly enough time considering abstract design, even when they understand the critical importance of line and value. Andrew Wyeth’s Christina’s World doesn’t rely much on hue or chroma for its impact. It’s a washed-out pink, a lot of dull greens and golds, and a significant amount of grey. And yet it was the most successful figurative painting of the 20th century, because it sublimated everything to a simple armature—Payne’s ‘three-spot’.

Reserve your spot now for a workshop in 2025:

Sell your work like the luxury good it is

Breaking Storm, oil on linen, 30X48, $5579 framed includes shipping and handling in continental US.

On Wednesday, I asked, “If an idea is so easily interchangeable that anyone can do it, what is the value of the brand itself?” In response, my friend and student Sandy Sibley sent me this article, in which fashion editor Katharine K. Zarrella calls out luxury fashion for its decline in quality and exclusivity.

She criticizes luxury brands for shifting focus from craftsmanship to profit, fueled by social media-driven consumerism, celebrity endorsements, and ‘buy now, pay later’ schemes. These have made luxury items ubiquitous, less exclusive, and often shoddy.

Zarrella argues that luxury is in a death spiral, with some companies reducing prices, selling through outlets, or racking up losses. She encourages consumers to reject overpriced, low-quality goods in favor of more meaningful purchases.

This may be luxury fashion’s loss, but it’s the artisan’s gain.

Winter lambing, oil on linen, 30X40, $5072 framed, includes shipping and handling in continental US.

Are paintings luxury goods?

“I’m not sure I would consider fine art as luxury goods,” mused Bobbi Heath, “but that’s probably because I value paintings way, way more than handbags and shoes and perfume.” Well, me too, but that doesn’t mean fine art doesn’t meet the economic definition of a luxury good:

  • Luxury goods see an increase in demand that is proportionally greater than the increase in income. As people’s incomes rise, the demand for luxury goods increases at a faster rate.
  • Luxury goods are not necessities; they are purchased to enhance one’s standard of living, prestige, or personal satisfaction.
  • Luxury goods are expensive compared to their non-luxury equivalents.
  • Luxury goods are seen as a superior product or status symbol.

Oddly, while the best of fine crafts have always been considered luxury goods, fine art isn’t usually called by that name. Until the modern era, painting served practical purposes as well as aesthetic ones. But try thinking of your fine artwork as a luxury good, and see how that affects your marketing.

Deadwood, oil on linen, 30X40, $5072.00 framed, includes shipping and handling in continental US.

Pricing and selling art

My student has made a careful study of what the art market in his rural area will bear. He prices his work accordingly. Prestigious galleries take the opposite approach, choosing swank locations in which to sell extremely expensive paintings. (The current correction in the high-end art market may reflect the same problems that Zarrella pointed out in the fashion industry.) There are, of course, thousands of examples in between these two extremes. Nobody but you can determine exactly where you should fall.

Ralph Waldo Emerson is reputed to have said, “Build a better mousetrap, and the world will beat a path to your door.” That’s never been true. Selling anything, but particularly paintings, is all about brand recognition. Get your name out there by participating in shows, using social media and advertising, and then worry about pricing.

All Flesh is as Grass, oil on linen, 30X40, $5072 framed, includes shipping and handling in continental US.

In every situation, it makes sense to market your work in the slickest way you can, in clean, well-ordered spaces and with on-trend frames.

Luxury goods are not sold by discounting. Instead, focus on creating a compelling brand, providing exceptional customer service, emphasizing exclusivity and quality, targeting the right audience, and offering personalized experiences to cultivate a sense of prestige and value around your work.

Reserve your spot now for a workshop in 2025:

The Birkin dupe and other fabulous forgeries

Tin Foil Hat, 6X8, oil on archival canvasboard, $435 includes shipping in continental US.

Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller (who survived his first sex scandal but not his second) and his wife, Happy, were in all things modern. Keen collectors of art, they donated a large part of their collection to the Museum of Modern Art to avoid death duties. Their apartment was filled with knock-offs of many of the donated paintings. That’s probably the only legit excuse for forgery.

The Rockefeller name was also associated with a high-profile dupe in 2008. Christian Gerhartsreiter was a serial imposter who took on the name Clark Rockefeller and pretended to be nephew of art doyenne Blanchette Ferry Rockefeller. He is horrible man, currently serving time for kidnapping, assault and battery, and murder.  

During his fat years, Gerhartsreiter proudly displayed a notable collection of Abstract-Expressionist art. He said he’d inherited it from his aunt, and he fooled most people including his successful, otherwise-astute wife. “The art collection was really the only tangible proof that he really was a Rockefeller,” she later said. Until their marriage unraveled, neither his wife nor any of the art experts who saw his collection realized that the works by Piet MondrianRobert MotherwellJackson PollockMark Rothko and Cy Twombly were all fakes.

Happy New Year, 6X8, oil on archival canvasboard, $435 framed.

Birkin dupe

I am reminded of that by this year’s second-best absurd art story. Walmart’s Hermès Birkin dupes are copies of the real Hermès Birkin bags. Hermès says that this bag was originally designed for young mothers, but they start around $7200 for a standard model. Furthermore, you have to have established a buyer’s history (translation: have bought other stuff from them) to buy one.

Walmart’s knockoffs are much more likely to attract the young mothers of my circle, since they start at $68. They also seem to have sold out over Christmas.

Toy Monkey and Candy, oil on archival canvasboard, $435 framed.

You used to be able to buy knockoff handbags and watches on Canal Street in New York, but the Birkin dupe is the first example I can quote of a major retailer going into the fabulous forgery business.

I wouldn’t know a Hermès Birkin bag if it slugged me, but I assume the fine finishing is better. Still, if you’re carrying one to impress (and what other reason could you have) the difference in sewing is immaterial. My daughter Mary insists that she’s going to compliment anyone she meets carrying a real or supposed Birkin bag on their Birkin dupe. “The ones who got theirs at Walmart will be thrilled, and the ones carrying real Birkins are going to be incredibly annoyed. It’s a win-win.” That’s my girl.

Prom Shoes 2, oil on archival canvasboard, 6X8, $435.

A serious question

Every time someone says of a Cy Twombly painting, “I could do that,” the answer has been, “but you didn’t.” Since the middle of the 20th century the cognoscenti have been saying that the genius lies in the idea, not the execution. The absurdity of that came to a head in this year’s number one art folly: the $6.2 million banana. We could call it fake art that was bought and eaten by a fake-currency billionaire. At least the banana was real.

I’m not a person who disses abstract-expressionism; I’ve written many times that Clyfford Still is among my top painters. However, it’s indisputable that a Mark Rothko painting would be easier to dupe than, say, a Leonardo Da Vinci (which is why the attribution of Salvator Mundi remains an open question). If an idea is so easily interchangeable that anyone can do it, what is the value of the brand itself?

I don’t have an answer to that.

There are still two slots open for my drawing class starting next week.

Reserve your spot now for a workshop in 2025:

Monday Morning Art School: cloud painting

Fog over Whiteface Mountain, 11X14, $1087 framed includes shipping and handling in continental US.

Cloud painting trips up emerging artists more than any other element. To paint clouds properly, you must first draw them properly. Clouds are not are flat little cutouts, and rendering them like that marks a painting as amateurish. The same perspective rules that apply to objects on the ground also apply to objects in the air.

A two-point perspective grid. You don’t need to draw all those rays, just the horizon line. The vertical lines indicate the edges of your paper.

 Clouds have volume

I’ve written before about two-point perspective. It’s a great theoretical concept but a lousy way to draw. However, understanding it is useful, especially in cloud painting.

Draw a horizontal line somewhere near the middle of your paper. This horizon line represents the height of your eyeballs. Put dots on the far left and far right ends of this line, at the very edges of your paper. These are your vanishing points.

A cube drawn with perspective rays. It’s that simple.

All objects in your drawing must be fitted to rays coming from those points. A cube is the simplest form of this. Start with a vertical line; that’s the front corner of your block. It can be anywhere on your picture. Bound it by extending ray lines back to the vanishing points. Make your first block transparent, just so you can see how the rays cross in the back. This is the fundamental building block of perspective drawing, and everything else derives from it. You can add architectural flourishes using the rules I gave for drawing windows and doors that fit.

As a practical tool, two-point perspective breaks down quickly. In reality, those vanishing points are infinitely distant from you. But it’s hard to align a ruler to an infinitely-distant point, so we draw finite points at the edges of our paper. They throw the whole drawing into a fake exaggeration of perspective. That’s why I started with a grid where the vanishing points were off the paper. It doesn’t fix the problem, but it makes it less obvious.

All objects can be rendered from that basic cube.

(There is also three-point perspective, which gives us an ant’s view of things. And there are even more complex perspective schemes. At that point, you’ve left cloud painting and entered a fantastical world of technical drawing.)

Basic shapes of clouds using the same perspective grid.

Clouds follow the rules of two-point perspective, being smaller, flatter and less distinct the farther they are from the viewer. The flattest part of cloud paintings is at the bottom of the sky. All you see of clouds directly overhead is their bottoms. In between is a steady shift from side view to bottom view.

A flight of cumulus clouds or a mackerel sky is always at the same altitude. That means their bottoms are on the same plane. That’s because clouds form where the temperature changes.

We paint cumulus clouds because they’re ubiquitous and lovely. Luckily, they form up in consistent patterns, with flat bases and fluffy tops. I’ve rendered them here as slabs, using the same basic perspective rules as I would for a house. In reality, their bases aren’t square and their tops are far puffier. This is just so you see how they’re distributed in the sky.

When cumulus clouds start piling up into thunderheads, they appear to violate this rule of perspective, but that’s just because of their vast size.

Basic shapes of clouds using the same perspective grid.

I don’t want you to go outside and paint clouds with a perspective grid. This is just for understanding the concept before you tackle the subject. Then you’ll be more likely to see clouds marching across the sky, rather than pasting puffy white shapes on the surface of your painting.

Maynard Dixon Clouds, 11X14, oil on archival canvas board, $869 includes shipping in continental US.

Painting starts with drawing

In order to paint, you must first learn to draw. Sometimes people point to abstraction to argue otherwise, but simplification actually requires top-notch drawing chops.

That’s why I’m teaching a drawing class on Monday evenings starting a week from today. This class is always a hard sell because people think drawing is ‘hard’ or ‘boring.’ Nothing is farther from the truth. If you’re trying to be a better painter, start by refining your drawing skills.

Reserve your spot now for a workshop in 2025:

Energy vampires and painting

Breaking Storm, oil on linen, 30X48, $5579 framed includes shipping and handling in continental US.

“Fifteen years from today, your income will be within 10% to 15% of the average of your 10 closest friends’ income,” financial advisor Dave Ramsey wrote. He was drawing on a massive 2022 social-media study by Raj Chetty, et al, that showed economic connectedness to be the single greatest predictor of economic mobility.

Like so much data analysis, this study is built on assumptions that may be faulty. Still, the idea lines up with common sense. Anyone who’s spent time in the art world knows that it’s easier to get a Manhattan solo show when your closest friends are on the Upper East Side. Humans tend to dress like, drive like, and talk like their tribe. We’re herd animals, and group-norming is a powerful impulse. If it makes you work harder as an artist or strive to be more successful, that’s great, but group norming can also be a force for mediocrity or worse.

Heavy Weather (Ketch Angelique), 24X36, oil on canvas, framed, $3985 includes shipping and handling in continental US.

Energy vampires

There are people who suck energy out of the room. Ramsey calls them “energy vampires,” and advises us to tell ourselves, “The people that I spend time with that are negative are going to be limited to the amount of energy that I have to help them not be negative.”

Some of these situations are unavoidable: the person in a health crisis, the elderly neighbor who’s alone during the holidays. We’d be inhumane to ignore them. But some of them are like an annoying dripping faucet; we’re so accustomed to their carping that we don’t ever assess whether the relationship is healthy.

We presume that if we give selflessly, the other party always benefits. It’s sometimes surprising when your best efforts backfire or are misconstrued, but you may be actually harming that other person more than you’re helping.

Energy vampires are often drama queens. It’s painfully easy to get sucked into their battles; the classic model for that being “let’s you and him fight.”

Brigantine Swift in Camden Harbor, 24X30, oil on canvas, framed, $3478 includes shipping and handling in continental US.

Situational depression vs. energy vampires

We will all go through times in our life where we’re dealing with crisis or tragedy. Situationally-depressed people can mimic energy vampires, with the same narrow focus and worldview. It’s sometimes hard to tell the difference, but humanity requires that we treat our situationally-depressed friends with kindness.

This is a special problem for artists

I’ve been self-employed since 1990. The one universal truth of working from home is that people think you’re free to lavish time and attention on them. It’s true that our schedules give us flexibility, but all those demands grow like weeds and before we know it, we don’t have time to paint.

Many painters have a similar personality style to my own: fundamentally we’re introverted but we play extroverts in public. Most of us are intuitive, because that’s how art works. These traits make us vulnerable to manipulation.

Camden Harbor, Midsummer, oil on canvas, 24X36 $3188 includes shipping in continental US.

Dealing with energy vampires

It’s important to remember that we’re not responsible for others’ emotional states. We need to set boundaries, either of time and space, or emotional barriers.

If you always feel drained, anxious, foggy, or stressed after spending time with a particular person or social group, that person may be an energy vampire. You don’t need to tolerate constant negativity. It gets in the way of your real work.

Reserve your spot now for a workshop in 2025:

Ghosts of Christmas past

Christmas Eve 2, oil on canvasboard, private collection.

Until her extreme old age, my Italian grandmother lived in Irish South Buffalo. We lived 38 miles north, but went to see her each week. The most important pilgrimage of our year was on Christmas Eve. You wouldn’t have dared skip it even if you wanted to.

A holiday that spans nearly fifty years ends up with a mishmash of traditions. My grandmother, who didn’t drink, once sent my aunt to the corner liquor store for a bottle of Old Overholt rye whiskey. It reappeared every holiday. My uncles and father, who did drink, instead quaffed Southern Comfort Manhattans until they were squiffy. It probably helped them tolerate the caterwauling of our Christmas play. I never got to be Mary; I have too many girl cousins.  However, I could racket along the high notes on “Oh, Holy Night.” That was the sweetest revenge of all.

“Christmas Eve,” oil on canvasboard, 6X8 private collection.

In my childhood, my grandmother served baccalà and anchovy crispelles because Christmas Eve is a fast day for Catholics. There were also ham and Brussels sprouts because this was America. We had struffoli and cut-out cookies and a birthday cake for an aunt. Later, when our family grew to outsize proportions that was replaced with lasagna because you can make it in advance.

My mother and aunt confessed they hated the smell of frying fish. “Nobody likes baccalà anyway,” my mother said. Well, I did, so I took over frying. It always disappeared. My own children now make it, but it’s one of the few things I still remember how to cook.

Late December is peak season for Buffalo’s notorious lake-effect snow, and the south half of Buffalo is where the winds sweeping off Lake Erie usually concentrate their fury. It was a mayor from South Buffalo, who in the teeth of a blizzard told us to, “go home, buy a six pack of beer, and watch a good football game.” (That meant any team other than the Bills, who were 2-14 that year.) One year, it blizzarded so badly that my then-new husband and I struggled to make the ten blocks from our apartment to Grandma’s house; another, we plowed our way down the Thruway to Rochester with snow over the bumper of our minivan. I miss that kind of weather.

Snow squall, 6X8, private collection.

That was before downstate governors started closing the upstate Thruway in bad weather; it was just assumed that drivers knew their own limits. Anyways, Americans back then had big families, and we kids were packed together in our snowsuits in the backs of station wagons. I don’t think we could have frozen, although the question never came up.

Inevitably, we were late for Christmas dinner. When we arrived, our snow clothes were piled in a mountain on my grandmother’s bed. One year, my infant cousin slept peacefully underneath them before my aunt remembered where she’d left her.

Because my extended family was devoutly Catholic (we were not), the party broke up in time for Midnight Mass. Back then, you could buy milk from streetside vending machines in South Buffalo. There was one on South Park Avenue, casting a solitary glow on the silent soft snow. My mother saved her quarters for this last Christmas Eve stop. We then headed home through the deserted streets, windshield wipers and flying snow lulling us to sleep.

Brooding Skies, 8X10, oil on archival canvasboard, $522

Later, I rejected my unchurched childhood and started going to midnight services myself. My grandmother grew too feeble to stay in her own home. Eventually, as is the way with all of us, she and most of her children passed on. My cousins and I are grandparents now. My own kids are busy on Christmas with families of their own. I’ll see them later this week.

Wherever you are, whatever your traditions, may this be the most magical of holidays for you.

Reserve your spot now for a workshop in 2025: