fbpx

Monday Morning Art School: stop flailing

An efficient plan for fast outdoor painting in oils.
Camden harbor, by Carol L. Douglas

Sometimes people ask me how we manage to get so many paintings done during an event. We avoid what my friend Brad Marshall called ā€œflailing around.ā€ That means those times when you seem to lose your way. Weā€™ve all done it, when apparently everything we know falls out the bottom of our mind. Iā€™ve written a simple protocol to avoid this. If you always work in this order, youā€™re less likely to flail around.

1. Set up your palette with all colors out, organized in a rainbow pattern; may be done before going out.
Putting your pigments in the same spots each time speeds up your process. And putting out all of them when you start ensures that you develop the painting based on what you see, rather than on whatā€™s at hand.
Beach saplings, by Carol L. Douglas
2. Value drawing of the scene in question, in your sketchbook.
If you do this on your canvas and then paint over it, you wonā€™t have it to refer back to when the light changes or you need to restate your darks.
3. Crop drawing, identify and strengthen big shapes.
If you start by filling in a little box, you only allow yourself one way to look at the composition. Instead, draw what interests you first, and then contemplate how it might best be boxed into a painting.

Parrsboro sunrise, by Carol L. Douglas
4. Transfer drawing to canvas with paint as a monochromatic grisaille.
This allows you to draw with a brush and check your compositionā€™s values.
5. Underpaint big shapes making sure value, chroma and hue are correct. Thin with OMS.
This underlayer should be thin, but not soupy, so it can accept top layers without making mud. You donā€™t want a lot of oil in this layer as it can lead to cracking in the future.

Eastport harbor, by Carol L. Douglas
6. Second layer: divide big shapes and develop details. A slightly thicker layer.
This is the body of your painting, without a lot of detail. Almost pure paint without either medium or heavy impasto. Note: for some painters, this is combined with the last layer.
7. Third and last layer: use medium and more paint, adding highlights and impasto.
This is the final layer, the one with painterly flourishes. Controlled use of medium here results in an even, bright, tough final surface.

Why the details matter

Super-simplified paintings may intrigue at first, but do they have enough information to satisfy over time?
Snow at higher elevations, by Carol L. Douglas

Yesterday we let the software engineer out of his cage. He traveled down to Pecos National Historical Park with us. He could get a signal enabling him to work. Meanwhile, we painted a snow squall approaching across the Sangre de Cristo mountains. (Weā€™re limited to satellite here on the ranch and a tethered hotspot is faster.)

As is true on the ocean, the sight-lines in the west are extended. You have hours to watch weather unfold. It made for great painting for us, and a nice work setting for him.
A friend once told me, ā€œIā€™d never date an engineer; theyā€™re too boring.ā€ Iā€™ve found exactly the opposite to be true. This one has an undergraduate arts degree and is a serious musician as well as being a programmer. When he talks about aesthetics, I listen.
An abandoned farmstead in the Sangre de Cristo Mountains.
We took him for a brief walk through a small, abandoned farmstead with log and stone barns. It was where Iā€™d spent most of my time during Santa Fe Plein Air Fiesta last April. The difficulty, Iā€™d found, was in the surfaces, which are textured and edgy and needed more definition than my usual painting style. How could I paint them convincingly without being too detailed?
ā€œAlla primapainting applies a low-pass filter over everything,ā€ he told me. ā€œYou need a way to convey high-frequency information in some places.ā€ Huh?
Think about the sound of clapping. Itā€™s impulsive and unexpected. If you were to look at a graph of it, you would see a spike. Thatā€™s what they call a high-frequency sound, and itā€™s exactly the same as a line, a dot, or an edge in your paintingā€”in other words, itā€™s a big, sudden, value shift, packed with information. It gets your attention. Itā€™s the opposite of low-frequency sounds, which are more like the hum of your dishwasher in the background.
Our office on the road. My trusty Prius is not up to this terrain. (Photo courtesy of Douglas Perot)
There are low-frequency passages in painting, too. A grey sky is an extreme example. Nothing much changes there. When you save a photo at too low a resolution and it gets blurry, itā€™s essentially been subjected to a low-pass filter.
When your teacher tells you, ā€œfocus on big shapes,ā€ or ā€œignore the detail,ā€ he or she is telling you to apply a low-pass filter to your painting. In general, thatā€™s good adviceā€”within limits.
And then there was snow, and a gravel road up a mountain ridge. (Photo courtesy of Douglas Perot)
In photography, those blurry, low-resolution photos may intrigue at first glance, but they arenā€™t that satisfying over time. In the long run, that may be true of paintings as well.
The trick, I think, is to vary high information passages with super-simplified ones. It’s a good goal but itā€™s not always possible in plein air painting, where you often have to quit before you think youā€™re finished.
Horno in the snow, by Carol L. Douglas. I haven’t looked out yet to see how much stuck.
And that was exactly what happened to us. One minute, it was dark and cold, and the next, snow was swirling everywhere, obscuring our view.  We slipped up the road back to the ranch. Iā€™m hoping for snow-cover to last through today. If it doesnā€™t, Iā€™m sure weā€™ll find something to paint.

Monday Morning Art School: applying to a plein air event

Judging art is very subjective. You canā€™t take the results personally, or the process will chew you up.
Tom Sawyer’s Fence, by Carol L. Douglas

This weekend, a reader asked for help in choosing slides to apply to her first plein air event. She recognizes that her favorites might not be a jurorā€™s favorites. Every artist feels like he or she could be better at this, including me. Iā€™ll share what Iā€™ve observed, but Iā€™d welcome your input.

Apply for shows that match your level of experience. Think of these events like applying to college: there are dream, target and safety schools. Later on, you can throw money away applying to dream schools, but for your first event, a safety or target school is a smarter choice. How can you tell what level the event is geared to? Look at the prize money. The bigger the prize money, the fiercer the competition to get in.
Look at last yearā€™s participants. Are they painting at a level you feel comfortable challenging? If not, find a different event to start with. There are many of them out there, and youā€™ll have a much better experience if youā€™re not thrown at the first hurdle.
Parrsboro Sunrise won a prize but I can’t seem to make it photograph well.
Take good photos of your work. One of my best paintings from 2018 wonā€™t be in my submissions because I donā€™t have a decent photo of itā€”it was gone before I got a color-balanced picture. Itā€™s very difficult to take a good photo of a very wet oil painting in the back of your car, but try your best. The photo should meet the minimum pixel requirements of  the application. If all you have is a low-res cell phone photo, send something else.
I did a few paintings in 2018 on very smooth boards, just to experiment. One of them won a prize at PIPAF, so the board has nothing to apologize for, but it has no tooth. That meant that my paintings have little impasto, and that in turn makes them look out-of-focus in photos. Itā€™s maddening, because theyā€™re beautiful in life, just not so nice in the digital world.
Jonathan Submarining apparently made me happier than it made anyone else (except Jonathan’s grandmother, who bought the painting).
Ask a trusted friend to look over your submissions. I have a painting from a few years ago that I adore, Jonathan Submarining. It was of a bunch of kids in a sailing lesson on a riotous day, and it was painted very fast, standing in the tide, with a fierce wind threatening to knock over my easel. But nobody scanning hundreds of photos will ever know what was involved in getting that painting right.
It took a disinterested friend to point that out to me. Sometimes, weā€™re the worst judges of our own work. We see the struggle instead of the finished product.
Santa Fe Sunset, by Carol L. Douglas.
Look at your work as thumbnails first. If a juror has a hundred applicants and has to look at five slides each, that may be all they ever see of your workā€”unless something about it really stands out to them.
Familiarize yourself with the entry juror, if that information is public. Iā€™m not saying you should paint like him, but you ought to understand whatā€™s important in his work. If every painting he does is carefully drafted and includes buildings and canyon walls, donā€™t send three structure-free marsh paintings and expect to be his favorite. If heā€™s a luminist, heā€™ll respond to light, and if heā€™s a brilliant compositor, heā€™ll respond to design.
Even so, I think itā€™s a mistake to pitch too closely to the entry juror. A lot of shows donā€™t identify the entry juror at all. Some use a committee. In any case, try to mix it up. If you can handle radically different subjects well, you demonstrate your versatility and your drawing chops.
Best Buds is a favorite from my 2018 season. While it was within the parameters of the show it was done in, it wasn’t actually done outdoors, so I won’t be using it for my slides.
Consider the order of your images. Online jurying systems allow you to define the order in which slides are viewed. If the entry juror is looking at your slides in sets, heā€™s going to read them left to right, just as he reads text. Make the first and last images particularly compellingā€”the first one to catch his interest and the last one so youā€™re remembered.
For heavenā€™s sake, donā€™t cheat. There are all kinds of carefully formulated ā€˜rulesā€™ about what constitutes plein air, and most of them are hot air. But if you didnā€™t do the painting outdoors, on location, donā€™t include it among your slides.
Donā€™t feel bad if you donā€™t get in, even if youā€™re a much better painter than some of the people who did. There are often factors involved in jurying that you donā€™t know about, such as a need to have more watercolorists, or geographical representation. Or, the juror just woke up hating sunsets that morning. Judging art is a very subjective experience and you canā€™t take the results personally, or the process will chew you up.

Is it still plein air?

When do your touch-ups cross a line and make your work a studio painting?
Autumn, by Carol L. Douglas
Earlier this season, a reader asked me what I do with work that doesnā€™t sell at plein air events. Most artists use this work to sell elsewhere. Occasionally, however, weā€™ll bring home stuff thatā€™s so site-specific it has no place in our current inventory.
Earlier this month, I painted a Moorish tent at Winterthur. It was one of about twenty garden follies theyā€™d set up for the season. The pink, orange and turquoise confection flapped proudly in front of a blazing panorama of trees. However, nobody else seemed as amused as me; the painting garnered nary a second look.
To make the change, I had to remove the brush marks from the folly. First, I carefully applied a small amount of mineral spirits, taking care that they didn’t run.
Yesterday, I excised the tent from the painting. I didnā€™t replace it with another focal point; I just let the landscape find its own structure.
It was necessary to get rid of the brushwork on the tent and the summerhouse so that they didnā€™t eventually appear in the surface as pentimenti. Because this painting is only a few weeks old, I was able to soften the paint with mineral spirits, and then carefully scrape down the top layer until it was flat. 
Gently, gently. You just want to take down the ridges.
It wasnā€™t necessary to remove all the paint, just the ridges. If you do this, be careful to confine the mineral spirits to the area you want to correct. It will soften both good and bad passages indiscriminately. And donā€™t press while scraping; youā€™ll distort the canvas.
Bye-bye, Moorish tent!
Then it was a matter of mixing some new green to fill in the area. If you arenā€™t careful at this point, youā€™ll end up repainting half your canvas trying to get the color right. You arenā€™t mixing a wall paint, so youā€™ll need to mix a few tightly-analogous colors. Then make sure you use a similar brush to the one you used originally.
This painting probably has about fifty added brushstrokes from the original. Is it still plein airfor the purposes of jurying? I used no additional reference, and the modification, although striking, was small. I think it counts, but Iā€™m interested in what other people have to say.
Penobscot, by Carol L. Douglas
The second painting I changed was one done in Santa Fe in April. At the time, I realized that a few brushstrokes would convert this to Penobscot Bay. It has been curing too long to open the surface and flatten it. It didn’t need that, in fact. It does not have one single bit of solid paint over the old painting; every change was made by glazing. Again, there was no reference used and very little paint. However, the subject has changed completely. Is it still plein air? I don’t think so because the finished work has no basis in reality.
Sunset, by Carol L. Douglas
The third painting I included because it has had absolutely nothing done to it. I painted it with Poppy Balser on a brilliant, cold evening at Rockport harbor last month and tossed it on the pile to be finished later. Pulling it out, I realized it needs nothing. Itā€™s bright and fresh and perfect as is.

They like what they see

If you paint in your studio, you miss some marvelous conversationsā€”with animals as well as people.
Working Dock, oil on canvas, by Carol L. Douglas.

Iā€™m using this residency to explore ideas I might otherwise skip over, because theyā€™re not particularly marketable. Yesterday, for example, I managed to channel David Hockneyā€™speculiar perspective and flat planes onto a grey working lobster dock in Maine. I was surprised when a lobsterman asked me how much I wanted for the painting.

I donā€™t want to sell any of this work before Iā€™ve shown it as a series. But I looked up my price and told him how much it will eventually be.
He repeated it back to me awestruck, and asked, ā€œAre you famous?ā€
A lobster pound at Tenants Harbor, by Carol L. Douglas, courtesy the Kelpie Gallery. Working docks are fascinating to paint. 
Well, not unfamous. But thatā€™s not really the point. Itā€™s like lobstering, I said. Both lobstermen and plein air artists have high operating costs and significant business risk. (We also work outside in all kinds of weather, but their job is far more dangerous than mine.)
ā€œItā€™s a lot more than lobster,ā€ he laughed. Well, if you price it by the pound, yeah.
My intention for this residency has been to do each locale first in oils and then in watercolor, but thatā€™s been shaken up some by the recent rain. Todayā€™s painting is the mate to Mondayā€™s watercolor. I hope I get it straight before I head home at the end of next week.
Little Giant, by Carol L. Douglas, courtesy of Camden Falls Gallery.
The other day, Bobbi Heath and I were hit onā€”very politely, mind you. Bobbi and I are both, erm, grandmotherly, and neither of us were remotely chic. Heck, I never even combed my hair that morning. Then again, I never do.
ā€œAre either of you ladies single?ā€ he asked. Bobbi thought that line needed work, but we were polite in kind.
Later, he came back and asked me, ā€œBut are you happily married?ā€
Pilings, by Carol L. Douglas.
A couple from Pennsylvania stopped to chat. A ruckus erupted in front of us.
ā€œA kingfisher!ā€ the husband exclaimed. After a moment his face fell. ā€œA chipmunk.ā€ Chipmunks are my most steadfast painting companions. Theyā€™re always chattering at me.
Iā€™ve seen so many turkeys this year that Iā€™m almost inspired to them (in my studio, in the winter). Iā€™ve also seen a lot of deer mice in unnatural poses. They like to visit the pantry at the end of summer, and they pay for it with their lives.
Iā€™ve met a lot of surprising creatures over the years. Iā€™m basically silent, except for the swish-swish of my brush, and animals get curious. Here in Jefferson, itā€™s been the usual woodland creatures. A few days ago, I had to stamp my feet at a squirrel who was coming too close. ā€œIā€™ll make a brush out of your tail!ā€ I told him.
Working Dock in its Hockney phase. There are elements of this abstraction that I’d like to recapture.
Working Dock, above, spent a long time looking as if the far wharf had erupted in flames. I wanted to maintain a separation between the trees. Passers-by avoided it when it was in that stage, particularly the guys who work on the dock. Perhaps they know something theyā€™re not telling.
A studio painter told me that when he paints outside, heā€™s thrown by the public commentary. I understand how that can happen, particularly if youā€™re not confident in your skills. But most people are kind, even to the rawest, newest student. They genuinely like what they see: the miracle of that scene over there being translated into this picture, right here.
If you work in a studio, or you work outside with headphones on, you miss some wonderful interactions. Yes, the public can be a distraction, but theyā€™re also a joy.

A common footman in the army of art

Plein air painting isnā€™t highbrow, but it speaks to my soul.
La casa de los abuelitos, by Carol L. Douglas
ā€œYouā€™re lucky to love to do something that people love,ā€ Clif Travers told me soon after weā€™d met. He meant that sincerely. Itā€™s easier to sell landscape paintings than the large-scale installation piece heā€™s working on.
The earliest known ā€œpure landscapesā€ (with no human figures) are Minoanmurals dating from around 1500 BC. Landscape flowered in Rome, Egypt and China. It died out in western art and was rediscovered in the Renaissance.
Rocky, by Carol L. Douglas
In China, the mountain-water ink painting was traditionally the most valued form of picture. Here in the west, landscape occupied a low position in the accepted hierarchy of genres, which went:
  1. History, including all that allegorical stuff;
  2. Portrait;
  3. Genre painting, or scenes of everyday life;
  4. Landscape;
  5. Animals;
  6. Still life.
This hierarchy was established in 16th century Italy. It elevated those things which rendered the universal essence of things (imitare) over the mere mechanical copying of appearances (ritrarre). While the Impressionists did much to knock this on its head, thereā€™s still a decided whiff of lowbrow to landscape painting, particularly the plein air variety. I think itā€™s because people actually like it.
Some days it rains, by Carol L. Douglas
The 17th century Dutch Golden Agepainters were among the first artists with middle-class customers, so itā€™s no surprise that they painted lots of landscape. But they were conflicted about it. Samuel Dirksz van Hoogstraten was the centuryā€™s most important art critic. He called landscape paintings ā€œthe common footmen in the army of art.ā€ But he also recognized that landscape ā€œprovides scope for artistic freedom, for coloristic virtuosity and for chance: for a dialogue between Mother Nature and the artistā€™s own innate ability.ā€
Itā€™s surprisingly difficult to find data on what genres of art sell the best, but I did find this top-ten list from Art Business Today. It’s for the UK art market, but ours isn’t much different:
  1. Traditional landscapes
  2. Local views
  3. Modern or semi-abstract landscapes
  4. Abstracts
  5. Dogs
  6. Figure studies (excluding nudes)
  7. Seascapes, harbor, and beach scenes
  8. Wildlife
  9. Impressionistic landscapes
  10. Nudes

Beach Grass (Goosefare Brook) by Carol L. Douglas
Obviously, none of us invented landscape painting, but each of us invents ourselves as landscape painters. When we start out, thereā€™s absolutely no market for our work. We create that market through dialogue. We produce our first paintings, gauge the audienceā€™s reaction (through sales and critiques), and then refine our message and reenter the fray with new work. Thatā€™s an ongoing process throughout our careers. Itā€™s no different from many other lines of work.
There are artists working out there in splendid isolation, not caring what the audience thinks, but theyā€™re very rare. For most of us, painting is a dialogue, and the other half of the dialogue is the buying public.
Bracken Fern, by Carol L. Douglas
Most artists donā€™t shape their work because a certain kind of landscape painting will sell better (although we are influenced by our peers and gallerists). But the best feedback we get is often in the form of a purchase.
I donā€™t paint en plein air because I think itā€™s somehow higher on a hierarchy of landscape. I do it because it appeals to me on a soul level. My friend Brad Marshall once said, ā€œMy clients donā€™t care if I did it in the studio or out. They only care about the quality of the work itself.ā€ Plein air is not, in itself, a virtue. Itā€™s only when it helps the painting become transcendent that it matters.

Rachelā€™s garden

One of the great virtues of old age is knowing that small problems are transient. So is bad painting.
Rachel’s Garden, by Carol L. Douglas. Watercolor on Yupo, full sheet.
Plein air events require that you churn out paintings despite the weather. The caterers, the hall, the advertising and the auctioneer cannot be easily rescheduled. The wet, whipping show must go on. Iā€™m not doing an event, but my goal for this residency is to paint outdoors despite the weather.
September can be the worst month for this, because itā€™s hurricane season along the Atlantic coast. We arenā€™t in as much danger here in Maine, but we often get the sloppy dregs of other peopleā€™s storms.
Neither Monday nor Tuesday were good painting days. On Monday, there were cutting winds, compensated in part by a dull pink sky that hung around all morning. Tuesday, it simply poured.
Yesterday (9/11) was a national day of mourning that I was determined to avoid. Itā€™s also the anniversary of my motherā€™s death four years ago. Here at Rolling Acres Farm, Iā€™m surrounded by young people and creative ferment. I was grateful for that.
Painting with Rachel Alexandrou in the rain. Photo courtesy Rachel Alexandrou and Maine Farmland Trust.
The barn here is built on the standard New England plan: hayloft above and animals below. My parents owned such a barn for fifty years, so I am as familiar with this model as I am with the lines in my own face. Perhaps there was a painting of gentle remembrance in the undercroftā€™s murky light. No luck; it is filled with the timbers from the original loft.
Rachel Alexandrou is the resident gardener here. Her garden is very different from the ordered rows of my youth. Itā€™s beautiful and productive, but also very unstructured. It would have been easier to paint a slice of it up close, but that wasnā€™t possible in a pouring rain. Besides, I was in no mood to ā€œkeep it simple,ā€ as a sensible painter would.
My childhood home, from History of Niagara County, N.Y.,1878, by Sanford & Company.
The garden is bracketed by a dead sapling and a Black Walnut. This tree is common in Americaā€™s heartland; a massive one was already middle-aged in my parentsā€™ lawn when their house was drawn in 1878. It was still there when the house was sold three years ago. While Black Walnuts are valuable timber trees, theyā€™re also allelopathic; meaning they kill any young plants trying to get a footing near them. The one at Rolling Acres Farm is the first Iā€™ve seen in Maine, but I didnā€™t want to paint it. I find them threatening.
That same black walnut in 2010.
I set up under a porte-cochĆØrethat connects the house and barn. Rachel has been experimenting with making Black Walnut ink, so she joined me.
The mist and rain came close to defeating us. I was further hampered by not being able to find my palette. The Maine Farmland Trust is dedicated to environmental stewardship, so there are no plastic plates. I used a paper one for a palette, not too successfully.
Rolling Acres Farm (unfinished) by Carol L. Douglas, was painted Monday.
I quit as dusk neared. It was then that I noticed I had a very soft tire. My car just isnā€™t up to the rocky tracks Iā€™ve been subjecting it to. A slow drive into Damariscotta and an air compressor, and I could head back to Clary Hill to see if Iā€™d dropped my palette there. I scouted along the lane to no avail. Walking back, I realized I have a marker light out in my car.
My temporary palette. Ouch.
One of the great virtues of old age is knowing that small problems are transient. So is bad painting. Today or tomorrow, it will all be fine again.

Dancing in the rain

If I knew what would happen, I wouldnā€™t bother trying.
The float, by Carol L. Douglas. Same subject as yesterday.
Today is my 38th wedding anniversary; Wednesday was my granddaughterā€™s third birthday. I knew Iā€™d miss these milestone events when I signed up for this residency, but had convinced myself that in the world of Skype and Snapchat, physical presence didnā€™t matter. It does.
Iā€™m reminded that my grandmother came to this country expecting to never see her homeland or family again. Despite our national myths of intrepid independence, we are a nation built on homesickness.
Even the umbrella can’t save this painting from the rain.
My intention in this residency is two-fold: to explore the intersection of water, land and mankind, and to do some really big plein air landscapes in oils and watercolor. In the world of art, oil and water definitely do not mix; together they can create an archival disaster. So, being a concrete thinker, I plan to alternate them. Wednesday was an oil-painting day, Thursday was a watercolor day.
Rachel Alexandrou, the gardener-in-residence here, told me it would rain at 12:30. She was accurate to the minute. I hunkered down in my car, my salad on my lap, and watched the storm cross Damariscotta Lake. Excess humidity of any kind is tough on conventional watercolor paper. It turns out that itā€™s not good for Yupo, either.
A droopy, dreary day from within my car.
Yupo is a synthetic plastic substrate: cool, slick and contemporary. Itā€™s the antithesis of organic. I like the way it takes watercolor, and its luminosity. However, it can be a jerk on a wet day. Water pools on the surface, and the paint is much more inclined to granulate than it does on paper.
Combined with intermittent rain, this made for nasty clumps of dark particles floating on the surface. The culprit appears to be what I thought was quinacridone violet. Thatā€™s not possible; that color isnā€™t granular at all. I have an imposter on my palette. I wonder what it is.
I switched to a quinacridone gold by QoR; it is clearer and brighter than whatever was on my palette.
I expected technical problems this first day, and I got them. My full-sheet drawing board, improvised from a folding presentation board, is too large for my swivel head easel. I donā€™t have my large brushes; theyā€™re still in England.
There is a subtle change that happens when you finally relax and paint. You stop fussing at your materials and start translating what you see. I did eventually get there, or almost there. I hashed out a painting thatā€™s mediocre in its drawing, rather muddy in its color, but interesting in its scribing. The beauty of Yupo is that it makes watercolor behave like no other paint.
Whatā€™s the end goal of this see-saw rotation of materials? If I knew what would happen, I wouldnā€™t bother trying. In this sense, experimentation with artistā€™s materials is vastly unscientific. We simply mix things up and watch. One in a hundred times it works, and when that happens, it’s magical.

Donā€™t suck

Brad Marshall gives me some trenchant painting advice.
On the wall at Camden harbor, watercolor sketch, Carol L. Douglas.

I paint with my pal Brad Marshall about once a yearā€”generally at Rye Art Centerā€™s Painters on Location, and occasionally here in Maine. Heā€™s retired from his day job as a sign-painter in New York City, and his paid gig these days is teaching watercolor on cruise ships. Thatā€™s influenced his practice. Instead of hauling his big field kit up to Maine in a minivan, he brought a small shoulder bag full of watercolor supplies in a Honda Civic.

This spring, the organizers at Parrsboro International Plein Air Festival gave each participant a hot-press watercolor block from Winsor & Newton. At 7X10, itā€™s the perfect size to slip into a backpack with my sketchbook, and this seemed like the perfect opportunity to try it.*
The big dark hull conundrum. I still don’t like the solution. It wasn’t until after I made the fatal brushstroke in the far water that I remembered this was hot-press paper. It, urm, doesn’t scumble well.
Since I donā€™t sell my watercolors, I give them less attention than they deserve. Still, I do a lot of them over the course of the yearā€”as value sketches for bigger oil paintings, to work out composition issues, or when I just donā€™t have the steam to set up my full oil-painting regalia. Watercolor is a great medium for experimentation.
We painted in Camden, on a dinghy dock. All floating docks drop with the tide, but this dock is accessible by ladder instead of a ramp. It limited my time. Once it was at the point where I could no longer toss my stuff up and over onto solid ground, I was going to have a harder time climbing back up. It would be ignominious in the extreme to have to ask the harbormaster to rescue me.
But it’s all just an excuse to stick our feet in the water anyway. Photo courtesy of Kathy Jalbert.
In a tight harbor like Camden youā€™ll usually see big visiting boats on the nearest docks. These are too close for a good composition (unless youā€™re doing a boat portrait) and obscure the boats on moorings. Still, that overlapping jumble of hulls is the nature of the scene. Iā€™ve been experimenting recently on using parts of boats, cropped tight, to suggest that jumble.
Dark hulls, close up, are not an inherently attractive composition. They make for a boring dull strip across the lower half of the paper. If thereā€™s to be any background at all, all that darkness lands on one side and unbalances the painting. Still, itā€™s such a common situation, and Iā€™d like to devise ways to deal with it.
Iā€™m a mutterer when I paint, Iā€™m sorry to admit. I wrestle through my ideas and problems out loud. Finally, Brad looked over at me and said, ā€œJust donā€™t suck.ā€ It seemed as good as any other advice, so I took it.
*I think this W/N sample block could convert me to hot press paper, if I can figure out the scumbling question. Itā€™s a nice, flat sheet, easy to handle, and it tolerated the sea mist better than my usual Arches cold press does.

Showing Alison the ropes

And in Camden harbor, there are ropes everywhere.
Pea Soup, by Carol L. Douglas

This week is the Camden Classics Cup, which draws all sorts of lovely boats to Camden, Maine (as if the place had any shortage on its own). Howard Gallagher asked artists from Camden Falls Gallery to scamper down to the harbor to paint the beautiful beasties, which Iā€™ll be doing while dodging raindrops. Itā€™s nice to do an event close to home, although it doesnā€™t happen often.

Alison Menke was up at Castine Plein Airlast week. Weā€™d met in June, when we did the Parrsboro International Plein Air Festival in Nova Scotia. She went from there to take first place at Telluride Plein Air, and then bounced back up to Maine. Iā€™m a fan of her bravura brushwork, but sheā€™s also a lovely person. When I realized she was hanging around the Maine coast, I invited her to join me in Camden.
Alison and me, in the murk of a foggy day.
Iā€™ve grown accustomed to the wealth of schooners in the harbor. It was enlightening to see them through fresh eyes. We set up on a floating dock to paint the bow of the Mistress, with Mercantile in the background. Mistressā€™ dinghy, Tricky Mary, hangs half-suspended from her bow. Itā€™s a nice, odd angle. Sheā€™s neither floating nor swinging.
The first time I ever painted in Camden, I was shy about setting up on a floating dock. Still, itā€™s the only place to paint in places where tides run high. Otherwise, youā€™ll inevitably get a twist in the hull as the angle changes. Steve Pixley, Camdenā€™s harbormaster, reassured me that it was alright, and Iā€™ve been painting on the docks ever since. This is one of the many ways in which Maine is not like other places.
Our paintings before the little yawl pulled in.
Alison was overly impressed by my knowledge of the schoonersā€™ habits. Itā€™s really just a question of asking the crews endless questions, something thatā€™s going to result in my being pitched in the water one of these days. The most important of these is always, ā€œWhen are you going back out?ā€
I love the cluster of day-trippers on the wallā€”Appledore, Olad, and Surpriseā€”but itā€™s difficult to paint them live, since theyā€™re never in one place long enough. However, in such heavy fog, they make fewer trips.
A FitzHugh Lane Day at Camden, Carol L. Douglas. There are boats you can only catchon foggy days.
ā€œItā€™s a real pea-souper,ā€ said a couple coming in from Isleboro to do their weekly shopping. With so many visitors and exotic yachts, itā€™s easy to forget that for many people, Camden is a working harbor.
By midafternoon, we both needed coffee and lunch. We downed brushes and walked up to town. In retrospect, I feel badly about my choice of dining establishments. Alison has been enjoying such Maine delicacies as Nutella crepes, blueberries and lobster rolls, and I directed her to a boring old chicken salad and a Tootsie Roll. I should have taken her to Harbor Dogs instead. Thatā€™s fine coastal dining.
It draws visitors from around the world, so Camden harbor is never boring.

We sat on a bench enjoying the sea mist and our lunches when we noticed a little yawl coming in. She tied up right next to our easels and blocked our view. Pretty enough, but at that moment, I hated her. Alison decided she was finished and packed up to head to Port Clyde. I reworked the bottom of my canvas, ruthlessly excising the mizzen mast.


 
ā€œIā€™ll see you around someplace,ā€ Alison said. Well, actually, sheā€™ll see me in three weeks at Adirondack Plein Air. Iā€™m looking forward to it.
Iā€™ve got one more workshop available this summer. Join me for Sea and Sky at Schoodic, August 5-10. Weā€™re strictly limited to twelve, but there are still seats open.