|
Nadia Jelassi with two of the figures from her sculpture, Celui qui nāa pas.
|
Until her arrest in August of last year, artist Nadia Jelassi was unknown in the West. (As of this writing, she doesnāt even have a Wikipedia entry.) She might have remained unknown, but for her arrest on August 17, 2012 in Tunis for ābreach of the peace and moral standards.ā She faces a five-year prison term.
Tunisian women prior to the Arab Spring revolution enjoyed secular freedoms we donāt associate with an Islamic state, including access to higher education, the right to divorce, and freedom from the hijab. This was by no means feminism as Americans understand it, but it was not the locked-down oppression of benighted fundamentalism, either. Women played an unprecedented role in the protests that brought down the Tunisian government, so the rise in religious zealotry in the power vacuum that appeared after the revolution was particularly sad.
|
And the work as a whole. |
Jelassiās sculpture, āCelui qui nāa pas,ā above, is an emotional response to the position she and other Tunisian women find themselves in. It obviously references the threat of stoning, which unfortunately makes it an implicit criticism of shariah. (Stoning is a legally-sanctioned punishment in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Sudan, Iran, Yemen, the United Arab Emirates, and some states in Nigeria.)
āUnlike what I used to do, it was not nuanced. I needed to shout, to express something raw. But I donāt think I sacrificed sculpture,ā said Jelassi, who says her controversial work was a continuation of the textile portraits she had been producing.
āCelui qui nāa pasā was shown without controversy at the El Abdelleya gallery in Tunis until July 10, when one Mohamed Ali Bouazizi photographed works in the gallery that he personally considered āreligiously offensive.ā He took these images to a suburban mosque, where he gathered up a group to return to the gallery. This small mob was blocked by a larger one of the artistsā supporters.
Although Bouazizi attempted to foment violence against the gallery, he was not responsible for her arrest. The following day, a wave of violence sparked across Tunisia, prompting a police response and curfew. āNobody lodged a complaint against me,ā said Jelassi. āIt was the State Prosecutor, the representative of the Justice Minister who opened the case.ā
Jelassiās protest was emotional and unscripted. Compare her to Chinese dissident artist
Ai Weiwei. He has long been known in the West as a visual artist; his work has been shown and is in prestigious public collections worldwide. To westerners, his sculpture and photography are not dissident, but to Chinese eyes, his work is inherently rebellious, because he magnifies the forms and traditions of the West rather than those of China. Our first instinct is not to say, āOh, thatās so Chinese!ā but to say, āOh, thatās so contemporary!ā The refusal to conform to the ideals of the government, to put himself outside the Chinese propaganda machine, was his fundamental rebellion.
|
Dropping a Han Dynasty Urn, Ai Weiwei, 1995, three gelatin silver prints, each 148 Ć 121 cm.
|
But while Aiās visual work is subtly anti-Chinese, his major protest took the form not of visual art but of intentional political theater. On January 10, 2006, he began to compose daily essays critical of the Chinese government. These rapidly attracted an international following. By mid-2009, he was being investigated by the Chinese government, and his communication with the outside world was completely suppressed in July of that year.
(As so often happens with political activism, the governmentās attempts to suppress Aiās work contributed to its success. He has been the subject of a book and a movie, and he is as visible in his absence as he was while blogging.)
Last week, I wrote about the limits of audacity as a virtue in art. Absent a message, it is nonsensical. But audacity is the necessary springboard for a genuine cri de coeur. All over the world, there are suffering people, but very few among them can use their talent to give voice to that suffering.
What a high calling that is.